This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence company that develops open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and functions as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design provides reactions similar to other modern large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to limit the capability of these two countries to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share cost to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more recognized competitors has actually been referred to as “upending AI”, [8] constituting “the very first shot at what is emerging as an international AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be freely available for usage, adjustment, watching, and creating files for developing purposes. [13] The business reportedly vigorously hires young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer science field to diversify its models’ knowledge and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on developing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer solely utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, suggesting its code is freely readily available for usage, modification, and viewing. This consists of approval to access and use the source code, as well as style files, for developing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had constructed up a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial general intelligence lab dedicated to research study establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s monetary service. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms hesitated in offering financing as it was not likely that it would have the ability to produce an exit in a short time period. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong efficiency for a low cost, DeepSeek became referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI model rate war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI models to take on the company. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research study and has no comprehensive prepare for commercialization; [20] this also allows its innovation to prevent the most rigid provisions of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to comply with the federal government’s controls on info. [3]

DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical capabilities rather than work experience, leading to a lot of new hires being either current university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits people with no computer technology background to assist its innovation comprehend other topics and knowledge locations, including having the ability to generate poetry and carry out well on the infamously difficult Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available totally free to both researchers and commercial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and responsible downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline data. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was developed to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper declared benchmark results higher than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the two Base models was likewise released concurrently, gotten by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed similar performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are always queried, and “routed professionals” that may not be. They found this to aid with expert balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can become excessively depended on, while other experts may be seldom utilized, wasting specifications. Attempting to balance the experts so that they are equally utilized then causes experts to replicate the same capability. They proposed the shared specialists to find out core capacities that are typically used, and let the routed experts to find out the peripheral capabilities that are seldom used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed solutions. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The reward design was a process reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was continuously upgraded during training to prevent benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL using GRPO in two phases. The first phase was trained to solve mathematics and coding issues. This phase used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second stage was trained to be valuable, safe, and follow rules. This phase utilized 3 reward models. The helpfulness and security reward models were trained on human preference data. The rule-based benefit model was by hand set. All qualified reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking information had “unique characteristics” different from RL on basic information. For instance, RL on thinking might enhance over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and qualified likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to help “further research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were substantially modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and used the mixture of experts (MoE) variant previously published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction information, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was created by a benefit design trained to predict whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of mathematics and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, shows, logic) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) data. Reasoning information was created by “expert models”. Non-reasoning information was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by human beings. – The “expert designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base model, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and confirm during thinking. Then the expert models were RL utilizing an undefined reward function.
– Each specialist model was trained to produce simply artificial thinking data in one particular domain (math, shows, logic).
– Expert designs were used, instead of R1 itself, since the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based benefit models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information containing both last reward and chain-of-thought causing the last benefit. The reward model produced reward signals for both concerns with objective however free-form responses, and questions without objective answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both reward designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was computed for math problems with a last response (put in a box), and for programming problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group performed extensive low-level engineering to accomplish effectiveness. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to build up properly. They utilized a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly calculation and communication, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise machine each expert was on in order to prevent particular makers being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, along with through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it exceeded performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a service much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic information generated by R1. [47]

A conversation in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first thinks of the reasoning process in the mind and after that provides the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “primarily” of two types (other types were not defined): accuracy rewards and format rewards. Accuracy benefit was examining whether a boxed answer is proper (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was examining whether the design puts its within … [47]

As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to resolve these problems and additional improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL process as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency benefit” to motivate it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the created thinking had an incorrect last answer, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly addresses questions, fixes reasoning issues and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses substantially fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers using as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have actually required only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested building its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly very little cost has been recognized as potentially challenging the global dominance of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was apparently “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively praised DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to supply opinions and recommendations on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export restrictions on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs consequently “stimulated market chaos” [57] and caused shares in significant global innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had actually led to tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are involved in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed hesitation of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its brand-new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interfered with the correct functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application shows user interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers found in China, uses censorship mechanisms for topics that are considered politically delicate for the government of China. For instance, the design refuses to answer questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially create a response, however then deletes it quickly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and constraints can only be eliminated to a minimal degree in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and specified: “We strongly oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are dedicated to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through tranquil methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into offering particular responses to some of these topics by requesting in its answer to switch certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some specialists fear that the government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading disinformation, surveillance and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms say “We save the information we gather in secure servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In response, the Italian information security authority is looking for additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had started a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited making use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s usage of individual information. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking “Deep Think allowed”, and every user might utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek thrills researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI infrastructure costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI model overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model exceeds Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model appears to be one of the best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market turmoil, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely outstanding”: “We should take the advancements out of China really, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘excellent'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends enormous Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily limited new sign-ups, mentioning ‘massive malicious attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We experimented with DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI postures powerful cyber, information privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.